Difference between revisions of "Crustocadosina"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<B><I>CRUSTOCADOSINA</I></B> [[&#344;eh&#225;nek, 1985a]], p.371.&nbsp; Calcareous dinoflagellates genus (see [[Elbr&#228;chter et al., 2008]], p.1299).&nbsp; [[Fensome and Williams, 2004|Fensome and Williams (2004]]) considered this genus to be not validly published because a type was not designated.&nbsp; However, [[Elbr&#228;chter et al., 2008|Elbr&#228;chter et al. (2008]], p.1299) implied that this generic name can be considered validly published as it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N.&nbsp; Type: not designated; "type species" - <I>[[Cadosina semiradiata]]</I> (name not validly published.
+
<B><I>CRUSTOCADOSINA</I></B> [[&#344;eh&#225;nek, 1985a]], p.371.&nbsp; Calcareous dinoflagellates genus (see [[Elbr&#228;chter et al., 2008]], p.1299).&nbsp; [[Fensome and Williams, 2004|Fensome and Williams (2004]]) considered this genus to be not validly published because a type was not designated.&nbsp; However, [[Elbr&#228;chter et al., 2008|Elbr&#228;chter et al. (2008]], p.1299) implied that this generic name can be considered validly published as it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N.&nbsp; Type: not designated; "type species" &mdash; <I>[[Cadosina semiradiata]]</I> (name not validly published.
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
  
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Latest revision as of 19:13, 21 December 2016

CRUSTOCADOSINA Řehánek, 1985a, p.371.  Calcareous dinoflagellates genus (see Elbrächter et al., 2008, p.1299).  Fensome and Williams (2004) considered this genus to be not validly published because a type was not designated.  However, Elbrächter et al. (2008, p.1299) implied that this generic name can be considered validly published as it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N.  Type: not designated; "type species" — Cadosina semiradiata (name not validly published.

Species List: