Difference between revisions of "Hystrichosphaeridium biforme"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Latest revision as of 16:56, 4 December 2016

?biforme Wiesner, 1936, p.154, pl.7, fig.9 ex Deflandre, 1946a, card 881.  Holotype: Wiesner, 1936, pl.7, fig.9.  Originally Hystrichosphaera (name not validly published), subsequently Hystrichosphaeridium, thirdly (and now) Hystrichosphaeridium?.  Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.56) as a problematic species.  The name Hystrichosphaera biformis was not validly published in Wiesner (1936), since the generic name Hystrichosphaera was not validly published until 1937.  Age: Late Cretaceous.

Parent: Hystrichosphaeridium