Difference between revisions of "Lithodinia bejui"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"<I><B>bejui</B></I>" ([[Zotto et al., 1987]], p.199-202, pl.1, figs.1a-b,2a-c,3; text-figs.5a-c) [[Williams et al., 1993]], p.55.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Zotto et al., 1987]], pl.1, figs.1a-b.&nbsp; <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Meiourogonyaulax bejui|Meiourogonyaulax]]</I>.&nbsp; Originally(and now) <I>[[Meiourogonyaulax bejui|Meiourogonyaulax]]</I>, subsequently <I>Lithodinia</I>.&nbsp; This combination was not validly published in [[Dodekova, 1992|Dodekova (1992]], p.46), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.&nbsp; Age: Kimmeridgian.
+
"<I><B>bejui</B></I>" ([[Zotto et al., 1987]], p.199&ndash;202, pl.1, figs.1a&ndash;b,2a&ndash;c,3; text-figs.5a&ndash;c) [[Williams et al., 1993]], p.55.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Zotto et al., 1987]], pl.1, figs.1a&ndash;b.&nbsp; <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Meiourogonyaulax bejui|Meiourogonyaulax]]</I>.&nbsp; Originally(and now) <I>[[Meiourogonyaulax bejui|Meiourogonyaulax]]</I>, subsequently <I>Lithodinia</I>.&nbsp; This combination was not validly published in [[Dodekova, 1992|Dodekova (1992]], p.46), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.&nbsp; Age: Kimmeridgian.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
  
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Latest revision as of 19:33, 21 December 2016

"bejui" (Zotto et al., 1987, p.199–202, pl.1, figs.1a–b,2a–c,3; text-figs.5a–c) Williams et al., 1993, p.55.  Holotype: Zotto et al., 1987, pl.1, figs.1a–b.  NOW Meiourogonyaulax.  Originally(and now) Meiourogonyaulax, subsequently Lithodinia.  This combination was not validly published in Dodekova (1992, p.46), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.  Age: Kimmeridgian.

Parent: Lithodinia