Difference between revisions of "Chatangiella hexacalpis"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<B><I>hexacalpis</I></B> Harker and Sarjeant in [[Harker et al., 1990]], p.117-118, pl.8, figs.11-12,14-16; text-figs.22A-B ex [[Harker and Sarjeant, 1991]], p.709.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Harker et al., 1990]], pl.8, fig.11; text-figs.22A-B.&nbsp; The name was not validly published in [[Harker and Sarjeant, 1991|Harker and Sarjeant (1991]]), since the lodgement of the holotype was not specified (I.C.N. Article 40.7).&nbsp; Age: Late Campanian.
+
<B><I>hexacalpis</I></B> Harker and Sarjeant in [[Harker et al., 1990]], p.117&ndash;118, pl.8, figs.11&ndash;12,14&ndash;16; text-figs.22A&ndash;B ex [[Harker and Sarjeant, 1991]], p.709.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Harker et al., 1990]], pl.8, fig.11; text-figs.22A&ndash;B.&nbsp; The name was not validly published in [[Harker and Sarjeant, 1991|Harker and Sarjeant (1991]]), since the lodgement of the holotype was not specified (I.C.N. Article 40.7).&nbsp; Age: late Campanian.
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
  

Latest revision as of 19:09, 21 December 2016

hexacalpis Harker and Sarjeant in Harker et al., 1990, p.117–118, pl.8, figs.11–12,14–16; text-figs.22A–B ex Harker and Sarjeant, 1991, p.709.  Holotype: Harker et al., 1990, pl.8, fig.11; text-figs.22A–B.  The name was not validly published in Harker and Sarjeant (1991), since the lodgement of the holotype was not specified (I.C.N. Article 40.7).  Age: late Campanian.

Parent: Chatangiella