Difference between revisions of "Cleistosphaeridium danicum"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
"?<I><B>danicum</B></I>" ([[Wetzel, 1952]], p.396-397, pl.A, figs.5-6; text-fig.8) [[Davey et al., 1969]], p.15.&nbsp; Emendation: [[Sarjeant, 1984c]], p.129-130, as <I>[[Achomosphaera danica]]</I>.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Wetzel, 1952]], pl.A, fig.6; [[Dietz et al., 1999]], text-fig.6b.&nbsp; <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Achomosphaera danica|Achomosphaera]]</I>.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Areoligera danica|Areoligera]]</I>, subsequently <I>[[Baltisphaeridium danicum Appendix A|Baltisphaeridium]]</I> (Appendix A), thirdly <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium danicum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I>, fourthly <I>Cleistosphaeridium</I>?, fifthly (and now) <I>[[Achomosphaera danica|Achomosphaera]]</I>.&nbsp; Questionable assignment: [[Davey et al., 1969|Davey et al. (1969]], p.15).&nbsp; Taxonomic senior synonym: <I>[[Areoligera senonensis]]</I>, according to [[Lejeune-Carpentier and Sarjeant, 1981|Lejeune-Carpentier and Sarjeant (1981]], p.15) - however, [[Sarjeant, 1984c|Sarjeant (1984c]], p.130) retained <I>Cleistosphaeridium</I> (as <I>[[Achomosphaera danica|Achomosphaera]]</I>) <I>danicum</I>.&nbsp; This combination was not validly published in [[Davey et al., 1966|Davey et al. (1966]], p.170), since those authors did not fully reference the basionym.&nbsp; Age: Paleocene.
+
"?<I><B>danicum</B></I>" ([[Wetzel, 1952]], p.396&ndash;397, pl.A, figs.5&ndash;6; text-fig.8) [[Davey et al., 1969]], p.15.&nbsp; Emendation: [[Sarjeant, 1984c]], p.129&ndash;130, as <I>[[Achomosphaera danica]]</I>.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Wetzel, 1952]], pl.A, fig.6; [[Dietz et al., 1999]], text-fig.6b.&nbsp; <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Achomosphaera danica|Achomosphaera]]</I>.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Areoligera danica|Areoligera]]</I>, subsequently <I>[[Baltisphaeridium danicum Appendix A|Baltisphaeridium]]</I> (Appendix A), thirdly <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium danicum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I>, fourthly <I>Cleistosphaeridium</I>?, fifthly (and now) <I>[[Achomosphaera danica|Achomosphaera]]</I>.&nbsp; Questionable assignment: [[Davey et al., 1969|Davey et al. (1969]], p.15).&nbsp; Taxonomic senior synonym: <I>[[Areoligera senonensis]]</I>, according to [[Lejeune-Carpentier and Sarjeant, 1981|Lejeune-Carpentier and Sarjeant (1981]], p.15) &mdash; however, [[Sarjeant, 1984c|Sarjeant (1984c]], p.130) retained <I>Cleistosphaeridium</I> (as <I>[[Achomosphaera danica|Achomosphaera]]</I>) <I>danicum</I>.&nbsp; This combination was not validly published in [[Davey et al., 1966|Davey et al. (1966]], p.170), since those authors did not fully reference the basionym.&nbsp; Age: Paleocene.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
  

Latest revision as of 19:10, 21 December 2016

"?danicum" (Wetzel, 1952, p.396–397, pl.A, figs.5–6; text-fig.8) Davey et al., 1969, p.15.  Emendation: Sarjeant, 1984c, p.129–130, as Achomosphaera danica.  Holotype: Wetzel, 1952, pl.A, fig.6; Dietz et al., 1999, text-fig.6b.  NOW Achomosphaera.  Originally Areoligera, subsequently Baltisphaeridium (Appendix A), thirdly Hystrichosphaeridium, fourthly Cleistosphaeridium?, fifthly (and now) Achomosphaera.  Questionable assignment: Davey et al. (1969, p.15).  Taxonomic senior synonym: Areoligera senonensis, according to Lejeune-Carpentier and Sarjeant (1981, p.15) — however, Sarjeant (1984c, p.130) retained Cleistosphaeridium (as Achomosphaera) danicum.  This combination was not validly published in Davey et al. (1966, p.170), since those authors did not fully reference the basionym.  Age: Paleocene.

Parent: Cleistosphaeridium