Difference between revisions of "Cordosphaeridium gracile forma areolatum"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
forma <B><I>areolatum</I></B> ([[Eisenack, 1954b]], p.67, pl.12, fig.21) Williams and Fensome, 2016, p.140.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Eisenack, 1954b]], p.67, pl.12, fig.21.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium inodes subsp. gracile|Hystrichosphaeridium inodes]]</I> subsp. <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium inodes subsp. gracile|gracile]]</I> forma <I>areolatum</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Cordosphaeridium gracile</I> forma <I>areolatum</I>.&nbsp; Williams and Fensome (2016, p.140) noted that the distinctive surface texture described by [[Eisenack, 1954b|Eisenack (1954b]]) may be a preservational artifact, and hence they recommended that this taxon be restricted to its type.&nbsp; Age: Oligocene.
+
forma <B><I>areolatum</I></B> ([[Eisenack, 1954b]], p.67, pl.12, fig.21) [[Williams and Fensome, 2016]], p.140.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Eisenack, 1954b]], p.67, pl.12, fig.21.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium inodes subsp. gracile|Hystrichosphaeridium inodes]]</I> subsp. <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium inodes subsp. gracile|gracile]]</I> forma <I>areolatum</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Cordosphaeridium gracile</I> forma <I>areolatum</I>.&nbsp; [[Williams and Fensome, 2016|Williams and Fensome (2016]], p.140) noted that the distinctive surface texture described by [[Eisenack, 1954b|Eisenack (1954b]]) may be a preservational artifact, and hence they recommended that this taxon be restricted to its type.&nbsp; Age: Oligocene.
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 
[[Category:Index2016new]]
 
[[Category:Index2016new]]

Latest revision as of 16:14, 7 December 2016

forma areolatum (Eisenack, 1954b, p.67, pl.12, fig.21) Williams and Fensome, 2016, p.140.  Holotype: Eisenack, 1954b, p.67, pl.12, fig.21.  Originally Hystrichosphaeridium inodes subsp. gracile forma areolatum, subsequently (and now) Cordosphaeridium gracile forma areolatumWilliams and Fensome (2016, p.140) noted that the distinctive surface texture described by Eisenack (1954b) may be a preservational artifact, and hence they recommended that this taxon be restricted to its type.  Age: Oligocene.

Parent: Cordosphaeridium gracile