Difference between revisions of "Spinidinium ovale"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <B><I>ovale</I></B> ([[Vozzhennikova, 1967]], p.99, pl.40, figs.1a | + | <B><I>ovale</I></B> ([[Vozzhennikova, 1967]], p.99, pl.40, figs.1a–b,2a–b) [[Lentin and Williams, 1977b]], p.147. Holotype: [[Vozzhennikova, 1967]], pl.40, figs.1a–b, lost according to [[Lentin and Vozzhennikova, 1990|Lentin and Vozzhennikova (1990]], p.69), who stated that no potential lectotype is available. Originally <I>[[Canninginopsis ovalis|Canninginopsis]]</I>, subsequently <I>Spinidinium</I>?, thirdly (and now) <I>Spinidinium</I>. Questionable assignment: [[Lentin and Williams, 1977b|Lentin and Williams (1977b]], p.147): however, [[Sluijs et al., 2009|Sluijs et al. (2009]], p.48) retained this species in <I>Spinidinium</I> without question. Age: Paleocene–Eocene. |
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:51, 21 December 2016
ovale (Vozzhennikova, 1967, p.99, pl.40, figs.1a–b,2a–b) Lentin and Williams, 1977b, p.147. Holotype: Vozzhennikova, 1967, pl.40, figs.1a–b, lost according to Lentin and Vozzhennikova (1990, p.69), who stated that no potential lectotype is available. Originally Canninginopsis, subsequently Spinidinium?, thirdly (and now) Spinidinium. Questionable assignment: Lentin and Williams (1977b, p.147): however, Sluijs et al. (2009, p.48) retained this species in Spinidinium without question. Age: Paleocene–Eocene.
Parent: Spinidinium