Difference between revisions of "Amphidiadema similis"
From dinoflaj3
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
− | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} |
Revision as of 15:32, 4 December 2016
?similis Marheinecke, 1992, p.80-81, pl.16, figs.5-7; text-fig.14. Holotype: Marheinecke, 1992, pl.16, fig.7. Questionable assignment: Marheinecke (1992, p.80). Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.24), Williams et al. (1998, p.39) considered this name to be validly published. Age: Early-late Late Maastrichtian.
Parent: Amphidiadema