Difference between revisions of "Amphidiadema similis"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 15:32, 4 December 2016

?similis Marheinecke, 1992, p.80-81, pl.16, figs.5-7; text-fig.14.  Holotype: Marheinecke, 1992, pl.16, fig.7.  Questionable assignment: Marheinecke (1992, p.80).  Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.24), Williams et al. (1998, p.39) considered this name to be validly published.  Age: Early-late Late Maastrichtian.

Parent: Amphidiadema