Difference between revisions of "Batiacasphaera laevigata"
From dinoflaj3
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
− | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} |
Revision as of 15:35, 4 December 2016
laevigata (Smelror, 1988b, p.152-153, figs.10G-H) Feist-Burkhardt and Monteil, 1997, p.40. Holotype: Smelror, 1988b, fig.10G. Originally Escharisphaeridia, subsequently (and now) Batiacasphaera. Taxonomic senior synonym: Escharisphaeridia psilata, according to Poulsen (1996, p.80) - however, Feist-Burkhardt and Monteil (1997, p.40) retained Batiacasphaera laevigata. Taxonomic junior synonym: Escharisphaeridia nuda, according to Prauss in Lentin and Williams (1993, p.213). Age: Late Bathonian-Early Oxfordian.
Parent: Batiacasphaera