Difference between revisions of "Cleistosphaeridium polyacanthum"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 15:41, 4 December 2016

"?polyacanthum" Gitmez, 1970, p.284-286, pl.12, fig.10; text-fig.22.  Holotype: Gitmez, 1970, pl.12, fig.10; text-fig.22b; Fauconnier and Masure, 2004, pl.23, figs.6-7.  Originally Cleistosphaeridium, subsequently Cleistosphaeridium?, thirdly Downiesphaeridium.  Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.31).  Taxonomic senior synonym: Hystrichosphaeridium (now Impletosphaeridium?) polytrichum, according to Masure in Fauconnier and Masure (2004, p.196).  Taxonomic senior synonym: Baltisphaeridium (as Cleistosphaeridium) iaculigerum, according to Brenner (1988, p.42) - however, neither Islam (1993, p.84), who retained Downiesphaeridium polyacanthum, nor Masure in Fauconnier and Masure (2004, p.196) followed this synonymy.  Age: Early Kimmeridgian.

Parent: Cleistosphaeridium