Difference between revisions of "Neodiacrodium timofeevii"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 12: Line 12:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 16:07, 4 December 2016

timofeevii (Shakhmundes, 1971, p.438-439, figs.1e-f [in published English translation]) Fedorova-Shakhmundes, 1976, p.95.  Holotype: Shakhmundes, 1971, fig.1e (in published English translation, p.226); Fedorova-Shakhmundes, 1976, pl.1, figs.2,2a.  Originally Acanthodiacrodium (Appendix A), subsequently (and now) NeodiacrodiumFensome et al. (1990, p.33-34) accepted this name as validly published, at least in the published translation of Shakhmundes (1971), the original of which is in Russian.  Shakhmundes (1971, p.438) cited "Fig.1d" as holotype; however, no illustrations appear to have accompanied that publication (or, at least, none is present in the copy held in the Geological Survey of Canada Library, Ottawa).  In the published translation, fig.1e is listed as the holotype of Acanthodiacrodium timofeevii.  Age: Early Aptian.

Parent: Neodiacrodium