Difference between revisions of "Operculodinium centrocarpum subsp. novum"
From dinoflaj3
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | subsp. <I><B>novum</B></I> [[Marheinecke, 1992]], p.54 | + | subsp. <I><B>novum</B></I> [[Marheinecke, 1992]], p.54–55, pl.10, figs.4,7–8. Holotype: [[Marheinecke, 1992]], pl.10, figs.4,7–8. Contrary to the opinion of [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.466), [[Williams et al., 1998|Williams et al. (1998]], p.441) considered this name to be validly published. Age: late early–late late Maastrichtian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:39, 21 December 2016
subsp. novum Marheinecke, 1992, p.54–55, pl.10, figs.4,7–8. Holotype: Marheinecke, 1992, pl.10, figs.4,7–8. Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.466), Williams et al. (1998, p.441) considered this name to be validly published. Age: late early–late late Maastrichtian.
Parent: Operculodinium centrocarpum