Difference between revisions of "Cleistosphaeridium oligacanthum"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 15:41, 4 December 2016

"?oligacanthum" (Wetzel, 1952, p.402-405, pl.A, figs.4,7-8,11a-b; text-figs.21-25) Davey et al., 1969, p.16.  Emendation: Wilson and Sarjeant in Sarjeant, 1984c, p.128, as Laticavodinium oligacanthum.  Holotype: Wetzel, 1952, pl.A, fig.8; Sarjeant, 1984c, pl.2, figs.4-5; text-fig.2; Fensome et al., 1995, figs.1-5 - p.1625; Dietz et al., 1999, text-fig.6g.  NOW Impletosphaeridium.  Originally Hystrichosphaeridium, subsequently Baltisphaeridium (Appendix A), thirdly Cleistosphaeridium?, fourthly Laticavodinium, fifthly (and now) Impletosphaeridium?.  Questionable assignment: Davey et al. (1969, p.16).  This combination was not validly published in Davey et al. (1966, p.170), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym.  Age: Danian.

Parent: Cleistosphaeridium

Infrataxon List: