Difference between revisions of "Cyclonephelium granulatum"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:44, 4 December 2016
?granulatum (Horowitz, 1975, p.25, pl.1, fig.4) Stover and Evitt, 1978, p.36. Holotype: Horowitz, 1975, pl.1, fig.4. Originally Doidyx, subsequently (and now) Cyclonephelium?. Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.36) as a problematic species. Conway and Cousminer (1983, p.35) questioned the age assigned to this species. Age: Late Triassic (probably not in place).
Parent: Cyclonephelium