Difference between revisions of "Leipokatium"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:02, 4 December 2016
LEIPOKATIUM Bradford, 1975, p.3066. Harland and Reid in Harland et al. (1980, p.223) contended that this name was not validly published in Bradford (1975) since that author did not provide a Latin description. However, it is based on a fossil type and thus does not require a Latin description in order to be validly published. Type: Bradford, 1975, fig.8, as Leipokatium invisitatum.
Parent: Subfamily Protoperidinioideae
Species List: