Difference between revisions of "Polysphaeridium fucosum"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 16:15, 4 December 2016

"?fucosum" (Valensi, 1955a, p.40; text-fig.2b) Davey and Williams, 1969, p.6.  Holotype: Valensi, 1955a, text-fig.2b; Fauconnier and Masure, 2004, pl.52, figs.8-11.  NOW Litosphaeridium.  Originally Micrhystridium, subsequently Hystrichosphaeridium, thirdly Polysphaeridium?, fourthly Dapsilidinium?, fifthly (and now) Litosphaeridium.  Questionable assignment: Davey and Williams (1969, p.6).  Taxonomic junior synonyms: Hystrichosphaeridium tubiferum var. brevispinum, according to Below (1982c, p.29) - however, Lentin and Williams (1985, p.190) retained Hystrichosphaeridium tubiferum var. brevispinum (as Hystrichosphaeridium tubiferum subsp. brevispinum); Hystrichosphaeridium (as and now Litosphaeridium) arundum, according to Below (1982c, p.29) - however, Lentin and Williams (1985, p.227) retained Litosphaeridium arundum.  This combination, as a questionable assignment, was not validly published in Davey and Williams (1966b, p.95), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym.  Age: Late Cretaceous.

Parent: Polysphaeridium