Difference between revisions of "Sentusidinium millepiedii"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 16:20, 4 December 2016

?millepiedii nom nov subst pro Sentusidinium? brevispinosum (Jain and Millepied, 1975, p.150, pl.5, figs.80-82) Islam, 1993, p.87.  Holotype: Jain and Millepied, 1975, pl.5, figs.80-81; Fauconnier and Masure, 2004, pl.69, fig.6.  Originally Cleistosphaeridium? brevispinosum, subsequently Sentusidinium brevispinosum (combination illegitimate), thirdly Sentusidinium? brevispinosum (combination illegitimate), fourthly (and now) Sentusidinium? millepiedii.  Questionable assignment: Courtinat in Fauconnier and Masure (2004, p.486), who considered Sentusidinium brevispinosum (Jain and Millepied) to be a problematic species.  The name Sentusidinium? millepiedii is proposed here because the name Sentusidinium brevispinosum is preoccupied.  Age: Aptian.

Parent: Sentusidinium