Difference between revisions of "Hystrichodinium pulchrum subsp. areatum"

Latest revision as of 19:24, 21 December 2016

subsp. areatum Marheinecke, 1992, p.44, pl.6, figs.8–11. Holotype: Marheinecke, 1992, pl.6, figs.9–10. Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.284), Williams et al. (1998, p.272) considered this name to be validly published. Age: early Maastrichtian.

Parent: Hystrichodinium pulchrum

Revision as of 13:38, 2 December 2016 (view source) Maintenance script (Talk \| contribs)		Latest revision as of 19:24, 21 December 2016 (view source) Maintenance script (Talk \| contribs)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	subsp. <I><B>areatum</B></I> [[Marheinecke, 1992]], p.44, pl.6, figs.8-11.  Holotype: [[Marheinecke, 1992]], pl.6, figs.9-10.  Contrary to the opinion of [[Lentin and Williams, 1993\|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.284), [[Williams et al., 1998\|Williams et al. (1998]], p.272) considered this name to be validly published.  Age: ~~Early~~ Maastrichtian.	+	subsp. <I><B>areatum</B></I> [[Marheinecke, 1992]], p.44, pl.6, figs.8–11.  Holotype: [[Marheinecke, 1992]], pl.6, figs.9–10.  Contrary to the opinion of [[Lentin and Williams, 1993\|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.284), [[Williams et al., 1998\|Williams et al. (1998]], p.272) considered this name to be validly published.  Age: early Maastrichtian.
	[[Category:Index2004]]		[[Category:Index2004]]