Difference between revisions of "Membranilarnacia reticulata"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "<I><B>reticulata</B></I>" [[Williams and Downie, 1966c]], p.220 | + | "<I><B>reticulata</B></I>" [[Williams and Downie, 1966c]], p.220–221, pl.24, figs.4,6; text-fig.59. Holotype: [[Williams and Downie, 1966c]], pl.24, fig.4; [[Bujak et al., 1980]], pl.10, figs.3–4. <B>Taxonomic senior synonym</B>: <I>[[Cannosphaeropsis ursulae|Cannosphaeropsis]]</I> (now <I>[[Eatonicysta ursulae|Eatonicysta]]</I>) <I>[[Cannosphaeropsis ursulae|ursulae]]</I>, according to [[de Coninck, 1969|de Coninck (1969]], p.43) and [[Gocht, 1969|Gocht (1969]], p.65). Lachkar and Masure in [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004|Fauconnier and Masure (2004]], p.390) considered this to be a problematic species, but apparently also accepted the synonymy cited above. Age: early Eocene. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:35, 21 December 2016
"reticulata" Williams and Downie, 1966c, p.220–221, pl.24, figs.4,6; text-fig.59. Holotype: Williams and Downie, 1966c, pl.24, fig.4; Bujak et al., 1980, pl.10, figs.3–4. Taxonomic senior synonym: Cannosphaeropsis (now Eatonicysta) ursulae, according to de Coninck (1969, p.43) and Gocht (1969, p.65). Lachkar and Masure in Fauconnier and Masure (2004, p.390) considered this to be a problematic species, but apparently also accepted the synonymy cited above. Age: early Eocene.
Parent: Membranilarnacia