Difference between revisions of "Microdinium alatum"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ?<B><I>alatum</I></B> [[Conrad, 1941]], p.5, pl.1, fig.C ex [[Sarjeant, 1967b]], p.247 | + | ?<B><I>alatum</I></B> [[Conrad, 1941]], p.5, pl.1, fig.C ex [[Sarjeant, 1967b]], p.247–248. Holotype: [[Conrad, 1941]], pl.1, fig.C. Originally <I>[[Palaeoperidinium alatum|Palaeoperidinium]]</I> (name not validly published), subsequently (and now) <I>Microdinium</I>?, thirdly <I>[[Palaeoperidinium alatum|Palaeoperidinium]]</I>?. [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.424) retained this species in <I>Microdinium</I>. Questionable assignment: [[Sarjeant, 1967b|Sarjeant (1967b]], p.248). The name <I>[[Palaeoperidinium alatum]]</I> was not validly published in [[Conrad, 1941|Conrad (1941]]) since the generic name <I>[[Palaeoperidinium alatum|Palaeoperidinium]]</I> was not validly published until 1967. [[Williams et al., 1998|Williams et al. (1998]], p.399) accepted [[Sarjeant, 1967b|Sarjeant's (1967b]]) indirect reference to [[Conrad, 1941|Conrad (1941]]), in which the name <I>[[Palaeoperidinium alatum]]</I> was first proposed, as indication of a type (I.C.N. Article 40.3). [[Lentin and Williams, 1976|Lentin and Williams (1976]], p.109) also proposed this name as a new combination. Age: Maastrichtian. |
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:35, 21 December 2016
?alatum Conrad, 1941, p.5, pl.1, fig.C ex Sarjeant, 1967b, p.247–248. Holotype: Conrad, 1941, pl.1, fig.C. Originally Palaeoperidinium (name not validly published), subsequently (and now) Microdinium?, thirdly Palaeoperidinium?. Lentin and Williams (1993, p.424) retained this species in Microdinium. Questionable assignment: Sarjeant (1967b, p.248). The name Palaeoperidinium alatum was not validly published in Conrad (1941) since the generic name Palaeoperidinium was not validly published until 1967. Williams et al. (1998, p.399) accepted Sarjeant's (1967b) indirect reference to Conrad (1941), in which the name Palaeoperidinium alatum was first proposed, as indication of a type (I.C.N. Article 40.3). Lentin and Williams (1976, p.109) also proposed this name as a new combination. Age: Maastrichtian.
Parent: Microdinium