Difference between revisions of "Operculodinium centrocarpum subsp. novum"

Latest revision as of 20:39, 21 December 2016

subsp. novum Marheinecke, 1992, p.54–55, pl.10, figs.4,7–8. Holotype: Marheinecke, 1992, pl.10, figs.4,7–8. Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.466), Williams et al. (1998, p.441) considered this name to be validly published. Age: late early–late late Maastrichtian.

Parent: Operculodinium centrocarpum

Revision as of 14:53, 2 December 2016 (view source) Maintenance script (Talk \| contribs)		Latest revision as of 20:39, 21 December 2016 (view source) Maintenance script (Talk \| contribs)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	subsp. <I><B>novum</B></I> [[Marheinecke, 1992]], p.54-55, pl.10, figs.4,7-8.  Holotype: [[Marheinecke, 1992]], pl.10, figs.4,7-8.  Contrary to the opinion of [[Lentin and Williams, 1993\|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.466), [[Williams et al., 1998\|Williams et al. (1998]], p.441) considered this name to be validly published.  Age: late ~~Early-~~late ~~Late~~ Maastrichtian.	+	subsp. <I><B>novum</B></I> [[Marheinecke, 1992]], p.54–55, pl.10, figs.4,7–8.  Holotype: [[Marheinecke, 1992]], pl.10, figs.4,7–8.  Contrary to the opinion of [[Lentin and Williams, 1993\|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.466), [[Williams et al., 1998\|Williams et al. (1998]], p.441) considered this name to be validly published.  Age: late early–late late Maastrichtian.
	[[Category:Index2004]]		[[Category:Index2004]]