Difference between revisions of "Cleistosphaeridium danicum"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 16:40, 4 December 2016

"?danicum" (Wetzel, 1952, p.396-397, pl.A, figs.5-6; text-fig.8) Davey et al., 1969, p.15.  Emendation: Sarjeant, 1984c, p.129-130, as Achomosphaera danica.  Holotype: Wetzel, 1952, pl.A, fig.6; Dietz et al., 1999, text-fig.6b.  NOW Achomosphaera.  Originally Areoligera, subsequently Baltisphaeridium (Appendix A), thirdly Hystrichosphaeridium, fourthly Cleistosphaeridium?, fifthly (and now) Achomosphaera.  Questionable assignment: Davey et al. (1969, p.15).  Taxonomic senior synonym: Areoligera senonensis, according to Lejeune-Carpentier and Sarjeant (1981, p.15) - however, Sarjeant (1984c, p.130) retained Cleistosphaeridium (as Achomosphaera) danicum.  This combination was not validly published in Davey et al. (1966, p.170), since those authors did not fully reference the basionym.  Age: Paleocene.

Parent: Cleistosphaeridium