Difference between revisions of "Cleistosphaeridium leve"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 16:41, 4 December 2016

"leve" (Maier, 1959, p.308, pl.30, figs.1-2) Davey et al., 1969, p.16.  Holotype: Maier, 1959, pl.30, fig.1; Sarjeant, 1983, pl.2, fig.3, pl.5, fig.1; text-fig.2.  Originally Galea (generic name illegitimate), subsequently Baltisphaeridium (Appendix A), thirdly CleistosphaeridiumTaxonomic senior synonym: Galea (now Chiropteridium) galea, according to Sarjeant (1983, p.108-109).  This combination was not validly published in Davey et al. (1966, p.170), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym.  Age: Late Oligocene-Mid Miocene.

Parent: Cleistosphaeridium