Difference between revisions of "Cleistosphaeridium lumectum"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Revision as of 16:41, 4 December 2016
"?lumectum" (Sarjeant, 1960a, p.139-140, pl.6, fig.1; text-fig.2) Davey et al., 1969, p.16. Holotype: Sarjeant, 1960a, pl.6, fig.1; text-fig.2. NOW Impletosphaeridium. Originally Baltisphaeridium (Appendix A), subsequently Cleistosphaeridium, thirdly Cleistosphaeridium?, fourthly (and now) Impletosphaeridium. Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.32) as a problematic species. This combination was not validly published in Davey et al. (1966, p.170), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: Late Oxfordian.
Parent: Cleistosphaeridium