Difference between revisions of "Conejoconus"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
"<B><I>CONEJOCONUS</I></B>" [[Knauer, 1970]], p.89.&nbsp; <B>Name illegimate - nomenclatural senior synonym: </B><I>[[Bonetocardiella]]</I>, which has the same type (see also [[Villain, 1975|Villain (1975]], p.196)).&nbsp; Calcareous dinoflagellate genus (see [[Elbr&#228;chter et al., 2008]], p.1298, who noted that the cyst wall is pithonelloid and so dinoflagellate affinity is questionable).&nbsp; [[Fensome and Williams, 2004|Fensome and Williams (2004]]) considered this genus to be not validly published because a type was not designated.&nbsp; However, [[Elbr&#228;chter et al., 2008|Elbr&#228;chter et al. (2008]], p.1298) implied that this generic name can be considered validly published as it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N.&nbsp; Type: not designated; "type species" - <I>[[Stomiosphaera conoidea]]</I>.
+
"<B><I>CONEJOCONUS</I></B>" [[Knauer, 1970]], p.89.&nbsp; <B>Name illegitimate &mdash; nomenclatural senior synonym: </B><I>[[Bonetocardiella]]</I>, which has the same type (see also [[Villain, 1975|Villain (1975]], p.196)).&nbsp; Calcareous dinoflagellate genus (see [[Elbr&#228;chter et al., 2008]], p.1298, who noted that the cyst wall is pithonelloid and so dinoflagellate affinity is questionable).&nbsp; [[Fensome and Williams, 2004|Fensome and Williams (2004]]) considered this genus to be not validly published because a type was not designated.&nbsp; However, [[Elbr&#228;chter et al., 2008|Elbr&#228;chter et al. (2008]], p.1298) implied that this generic name can be considered validly published as it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N.&nbsp; Type: not designated; "type species" &mdash; <I>[[Stomiosphaera conoidea]]</I>.
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
  

Latest revision as of 20:11, 21 December 2016

"CONEJOCONUS" Knauer, 1970, p.89.  Name illegitimate — nomenclatural senior synonym: Bonetocardiella, which has the same type (see also Villain (1975, p.196)).  Calcareous dinoflagellate genus (see Elbrächter et al., 2008, p.1298, who noted that the cyst wall is pithonelloid and so dinoflagellate affinity is questionable).  Fensome and Williams (2004) considered this genus to be not validly published because a type was not designated.  However, Elbrächter et al. (2008, p.1298) implied that this generic name can be considered validly published as it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N.  Type: not designated; "type species" — Stomiosphaera conoidea.

Species List: