Difference between revisions of "Palaecysta palmula"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<B><I>palmula</I></B> ([[Davey, 1982b]], p.11-12, pl.1, figs.1-4) Williams and Fensome, 2016, p.140.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Davey, 1982b]], pl.1, figs.1-3; [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004]], pl.76, figs.11-13  Originally <I>[[Systematophora palmula|Systematophora]]</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Palaecysta</I>.&nbsp; This combination was not validly published in Chen (2013, p.293), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.&nbsp; Chen (2013, p.293) listed some of his illustrations as paratypes; however, since Chen's paper does not constitute the protologue for this species, and as the illustations do not purport to be from [[Davey, 1982b|Davey's (1982b]]) original study, they are not paratypes.&nbsp; Age: Ryazanian-Valanginian.
+
<B><I>palmula</I></B> ([[Davey, 1982b]], p.11&ndash;12, pl.1, figs.1&ndash;4) [[Williams and Fensome, 2016]], p.140.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Davey, 1982b]], pl.1, figs.1&ndash;3; [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004]], pl.76, figs.11&ndash;13  Originally <I>[[Systematophora palmula|Systematophora]]</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Palaecysta</I>.&nbsp; This combination was not validly published in [[Chen, 2013|Chen (2013]], p.293), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.&nbsp; [[Chen, 2013|Chen (2013]], p.293) listed some of his illustrations as paratypes; however, since Chen's paper does not constitute the protologue for this species, and as the illustations do not purport to be from [[Davey, 1982b|Davey's (1982b]]) original study, they are not paratypes.&nbsp; Age: Ryazanian&ndash;Valanginian.
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 
[[Category:Index2016new]]
 
[[Category:Index2016new]]

Latest revision as of 20:40, 21 December 2016

palmula (Davey, 1982b, p.11–12, pl.1, figs.1–4) Williams and Fensome, 2016, p.140.  Holotype: Davey, 1982b, pl.1, figs.1–3; Fauconnier and Masure, 2004, pl.76, figs.11–13 Originally Systematophora, subsequently (and now) Palaecysta.  This combination was not validly published in Chen (2013, p.293), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.  Chen (2013, p.293) listed some of his illustrations as paratypes; however, since Chen's paper does not constitute the protologue for this species, and as the illustations do not purport to be from Davey's (1982b) original study, they are not paratypes.  Age: Ryazanian–Valanginian.

Parent: Palaecysta

Infrataxon List: