Difference between revisions of "Pseudoceratium hansgochtii"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Revision as of 17:16, 4 December 2016
"hansgochtii" Lentin and Williams, 1981, p.236. Holotype: Pocock, 1962, pl.14, fig.213, lost according to Jansonius (1986, p.222). Originally Pseudoceratium gochtii Pocock, 1962 (name illegitimate), subsequently Pseudoceratium hansgochtii. Substitute name for Pseudoceratium gochtii Pocock, 1962, p.79, pl.14, figs.213-214 (an illegitimate name). Taxonomic senior synonym: Broomea (now Batioladinium) jaegeri, according to Singh (1971, p.320). Age: Late Albian-Early Cenomanian.
Parent: Pseudoceratium