Difference between revisions of "Pseudopithonella Trejo 1983 Appendix A"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<B><I>PSEUDOPITHONELLA</I></B> [[Trejo, 1983]], p.11. A calcisphere genus according to [[Elbrächter et al., 2008|Elbrächter et al. (2008]], p.1303). This name was proposed under the I.C.Z.N. and the homonym <I>Pseudopithonella</I> Versteegh does not compete against it unless it is brought under the I.C.N. [[Elbrächter et al., 2008|Elbrächter et al. (2008]], p.1301) stated "[[Trejo, 1983|Trejo (1983]]) validly published <I>Pseudopithonella</I> Trejo under the I.C.Z.N., but we do not consider this fossil as belonging to any group of organisms governed by the I.C.B.N. [now I.C.N.] (... even the Dinophyceae)". | <B><I>PSEUDOPITHONELLA</I></B> [[Trejo, 1983]], p.11. A calcisphere genus according to [[Elbrächter et al., 2008|Elbrächter et al. (2008]], p.1303). This name was proposed under the I.C.Z.N. and the homonym <I>Pseudopithonella</I> Versteegh does not compete against it unless it is brought under the I.C.N. [[Elbrächter et al., 2008|Elbrächter et al. (2008]], p.1301) stated "[[Trejo, 1983|Trejo (1983]]) validly published <I>Pseudopithonella</I> Trejo under the I.C.Z.N., but we do not consider this fossil as belonging to any group of organisms governed by the I.C.B.N. [now I.C.N.] (... even the Dinophyceae)". | ||
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Index2016new]] | ||
[[Category:Taxon]] | [[Category:Taxon]] | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:33, 4 December 2016
PSEUDOPITHONELLA Trejo, 1983, p.11. A calcisphere genus according to Elbrächter et al. (2008, p.1303). This name was proposed under the I.C.Z.N. and the homonym Pseudopithonella Versteegh does not compete against it unless it is brought under the I.C.N. Elbrächter et al. (2008, p.1301) stated "Trejo (1983) validly published Pseudopithonella Trejo under the I.C.Z.N., but we do not consider this fossil as belonging to any group of organisms governed by the I.C.B.N. [now I.C.N.] (... even the Dinophyceae)".
Parent: Subfamily Calciodinelloideae