Difference between revisions of "Veryhachium trisulcum Appendix A"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
"<nowiki>*</nowiki><I><B>trisulcum</B></I>" [[Deunff, 1951]], p.323, caption to text-fig.3 ex [[Deunff, 1959]], p.27-28, pl.1, figs.1-4,8,10,12-14,16-17,20,22-23.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Deunff, 1959]], pl.1, fig.4 (see [[Fensome et al., 1990]], p.526).&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum]]</I> (name not validly published), subsequently <I>Veryhachium trisulcum</I> (name not validly published), thirdly <I>Veryhachium trisulcum</I>, fourthly <I>[[Veryhachium trispinosum subsp. trisulcum Appendix A|Veryhachium trispinosum]]</I> subsp. <I>[[Veryhachium trispinosum subsp. trisulcum Appendix A|trisulcum]]</I> (combination not validly published, Appendix A).&nbsp; <B>Taxonomic senior synonym</B>: <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trispinosum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I> (now <I>[[Veryhachium trispinosum Appendix A|Veryhachium]]</I>) <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trispinosum|trispinosum]]</I>, according to [[Stancliffe and Sarjeant, 1994|Stancliffe and Sarjeant (1994]], p.233).&nbsp; The nomenclatural type of the genus <I>Veryhachium</I> remains the holotype of <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I> (subsequently <I>Veryhachium</I>) <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum|trisulcum]]</I>.&nbsp; The names <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum]]</I> and <I>Veryhachium trisulcum</I> were not validly published respectively in [[Deunff, 1951|Deunff (1951]], caption to text-fig.3) and [[Deunff, 1954b|Deunff (1954b]], p.306), since no description was provided in the former publication and no illustration was provided in the latter publication.&nbsp; This name was not validly published in [[Deunff, 1954b|Deunff (1954b]], p.306) since no illustration was provided.&nbsp; The name <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum]]</I> was not validly published in [[Deunff, 1951|Deunff (1951]], p.323) since no description was provided.&nbsp; [[Cramer and Diez, 1979|Cramer and Diez (1979]], p.47) considered <I>Veryhachium trisulcum</I> (or <I>[[Veryhachium trispinosum Appendix A|Veryhachium trispinosum]]</I>) to be the possible taxonomic senior synonym of <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium monacanthum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I> (now <I>[[Deunffia monacantha Appendix A|Deunffia]]</I>) <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium monacanthum|monacanthum]]</I>.&nbsp; [[Beju, 1972|Beju (1972]], p.718) and [[Tynni, 1976|Tynni (1976]], p.38) misspelled the specific epithet as "<I>trisulcatum</I>".&nbsp; Age: Mid Ordovician.
+
"<nowiki>*</nowiki><I><B>trisulcum</B></I>" [[Deunff, 1951]], p.323, caption to text-fig.3 ex [[Deunff, 1959]], p.27&ndash;28, pl.1, figs.1&ndash;4,8,10,12&ndash;14,16&ndash;17,20,22&ndash;23.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Deunff, 1959]], pl.1, fig.4 (see [[Fensome et al., 1990]], p.526).&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum]]</I> (name not validly published), subsequently <I>Veryhachium trisulcum</I> (name not validly published), thirdly <I>Veryhachium trisulcum</I>, fourthly <I>[[Veryhachium trispinosum subsp. trisulcum Appendix A|Veryhachium trispinosum]]</I> subsp. <I>[[Veryhachium trispinosum subsp. trisulcum Appendix A|trisulcum]]</I> (combination not validly published, Appendix A).&nbsp; <B>Taxonomic senior synonym</B>: <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trispinosum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I> (now <I>[[Veryhachium trispinosum Appendix A|Veryhachium]]</I>) <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trispinosum|trispinosum]]</I>, according to [[Stancliffe and Sarjeant, 1994|Stancliffe and Sarjeant (1994]], p.233).&nbsp; The nomenclatural type of the genus <I>Veryhachium</I> remains the holotype of <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I> (subsequently <I>Veryhachium</I>) <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum|trisulcum]]</I>.&nbsp; The names <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum]]</I> and <I>Veryhachium trisulcum</I> were not validly published respectively in [[Deunff, 1951|Deunff (1951]], caption to text-fig.3) and [[Deunff, 1954b|Deunff (1954b]], p.306), since no description was provided in the former publication and no illustration was provided in the latter publication.&nbsp; This name was not validly published in [[Deunff, 1954b|Deunff (1954b]], p.306) since no illustration was provided.&nbsp; The name <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum]]</I> was not validly published in [[Deunff, 1951|Deunff (1951]], p.323) since no description was provided.&nbsp; [[Cramer and Diez, 1979|Cramer and Diez (1979]], p.47) considered <I>Veryhachium trisulcum</I> (or <I>[[Veryhachium trispinosum Appendix A|Veryhachium trispinosum]]</I>) to be the possible taxonomic senior synonym of <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium monacanthum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I> (now <I>[[Deunffia monacantha Appendix A|Deunffia]]</I>) <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium monacanthum|monacanthum]]</I>.&nbsp; [[Beju, 1972|Beju (1972]], p.718) and [[Tynni, 1976|Tynni (1976]], p.38) misspelled the specific epithet as "<I>trisulcatum</I>".&nbsp; Age: Middle Ordovician.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
  

Latest revision as of 21:04, 21 December 2016

"*trisulcum" Deunff, 1951, p.323, caption to text-fig.3 ex Deunff, 1959, p.27–28, pl.1, figs.1–4,8,10,12–14,16–17,20,22–23.  Holotype: Deunff, 1959, pl.1, fig.4 (see Fensome et al., 1990, p.526).  Originally Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum (name not validly published), subsequently Veryhachium trisulcum (name not validly published), thirdly Veryhachium trisulcum, fourthly Veryhachium trispinosum subsp. trisulcum (combination not validly published, Appendix A).  Taxonomic senior synonym: Hystrichosphaeridium (now Veryhachium) trispinosum, according to Stancliffe and Sarjeant (1994, p.233).  The nomenclatural type of the genus Veryhachium remains the holotype of Hystrichosphaeridium (subsequently Veryhachium) trisulcum.  The names Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum and Veryhachium trisulcum were not validly published respectively in Deunff (1951, caption to text-fig.3) and Deunff (1954b, p.306), since no description was provided in the former publication and no illustration was provided in the latter publication.  This name was not validly published in Deunff (1954b, p.306) since no illustration was provided.  The name Hystrichosphaeridium trisulcum was not validly published in Deunff (1951, p.323) since no description was provided.  Cramer and Diez (1979, p.47) considered Veryhachium trisulcum (or Veryhachium trispinosum) to be the possible taxonomic senior synonym of Hystrichosphaeridium (now Deunffia) monacanthumBeju (1972, p.718) and Tynni (1976, p.38) misspelled the specific epithet as "trisulcatum".  Age: Middle Ordovician.

Parent: Veryhachium_Appendix A