Difference between revisions of "Batioladinium gochtii"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Revision as of 15:35, 4 December 2016
?gochtii (Alberti, 1961, p.27, pl.5, figs.8-10,?16) Lentin and Williams, 1977b, p.14. Holotype: Alberti, 1961, pl.5, fig.8. Originally Broomea, subsequently (and now) Batioladinium?, thirdly Necrobroomea, fourthly Imbatodinium. Lentin and Williams (1993, p.58) retained this species in Batioladinium. Questionable assignment: Lentin and Williams (1977b, p.14). Taxonomic junior synonyms: Batioladinium pomum and Batioladinium varigranosum, both according to Below (1990, p.53). Below (1990, p.53) considered Batioladinium? gochtii to be a possible taxonomic synonym of Broomea (now Batioladinium) jaegeri. Age: Valanginian-?Hauterivian.
Infrataxon List: