Difference between revisions of "Cleistosphaeridium bahiaense"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Revision as of 15:40, 4 December 2016
"?bahiaense" (Regali et al., 1974, p.289-290, pl.23, fig.5) Lentin and Williams, 1981, p.47. Holotype: Regali et al., 1974, pl.23, fig.5. NOW Operculodinium. Originally Hystrichosphaeridium, subsequently Cleistosphaeridium?, thirdly Impletosphaeridium?, fourthly (and now) Operculodinium. Questionable assignment: Lentin and Williams (1981, p.47). Age: Eocene-Oligocene.
Parent: Cleistosphaeridium