Difference between revisions of "Areoligera tenuicapillata subsp. pinopollina"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | subsp. <I><B>pinopollina</B></I> ([[Wetzel, 1933b]], p.42 | + | subsp. <I><B>pinopollina</B></I> ([[Wetzel, 1933b]], p.42–43, pl.4, fig.22 ex [[Downie and Sarjeant, 1965]], p.86) [[Lentin and Williams, 1973]], p.16. Holotype: [[Wetzel, 1933b]], pl.4, fig.22. Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaera tenuicapillata forma pinopollina|Hystrichosphaera tenuicapillata]]</I> forma <I>[[Hystrichosphaera tenuicapillata forma pinopollina|pinopollina]]</I> (name not validly published), subsequently <I>[[Areoligera tenuicapillata forma pinopollina|Areoligera tenuicapillata]]</I> forma <I>[[Areoligera tenuicapillata forma pinopollina|pinopollina]]</I>, thirdly (and now) <I>Areoligera tenuicapillata</I> subsp. <I>pinopollina</I>. [[Lejeune-Carpentier, 1938a|Lejeune-Carpentier (1938a]], p.B167) speculated that this taxon might be based on coniferous pollen. [[Lentin and Williams, 1989|Lentin and Williams (1989]], p.26) believed it may be a damaged specimen of <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium flosculus|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I> (now <I>[[Florentinia flosculus|Florentinia]]</I>?) <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium flosculus|flosculus]]</I>. The name <I>[[Hystrichosphaera tenuicapillata forma pinopollina|Hystrichosphaera tenuicapillata]]</I> forma <I>[[Hystrichosphaera tenuicapillata forma pinopollina|pinopollina]]</I> was not validly published in [[Wetzel, 1933b|Wetzel (1933b]]), since the species name was not validly published until 1937. Age: Senonian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:03, 21 December 2016
subsp. pinopollina (Wetzel, 1933b, p.42–43, pl.4, fig.22 ex Downie and Sarjeant, 1965, p.86) Lentin and Williams, 1973, p.16. Holotype: Wetzel, 1933b, pl.4, fig.22. Originally Hystrichosphaera tenuicapillata forma pinopollina (name not validly published), subsequently Areoligera tenuicapillata forma pinopollina, thirdly (and now) Areoligera tenuicapillata subsp. pinopollina. Lejeune-Carpentier (1938a, p.B167) speculated that this taxon might be based on coniferous pollen. Lentin and Williams (1989, p.26) believed it may be a damaged specimen of Hystrichosphaeridium (now Florentinia?) flosculus. The name Hystrichosphaera tenuicapillata forma pinopollina was not validly published in Wetzel (1933b), since the species name was not validly published until 1937. Age: Senonian.
Parent: Areoligera tenuicapillata