Difference between revisions of "Batioladinium gochtii"
From dinoflaj3
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ?<I><B>gochtii</B></I> ([[Alberti, 1961]], p.27, pl.5, figs.8 | + | ?<I><B>gochtii</B></I> ([[Alberti, 1961]], p.27, pl.5, figs.8–10,?16) [[Lentin and Williams, 1977b]], p.14. Holotype: [[Alberti, 1961]], pl.5, fig.8. Originally <I>[[Broomea gochtii|Broomea]]</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Batioladinium</I>?, thirdly <I>[[Necrobroomea gochtii|Necrobroomea]]</I>, fourthly <I>[[Imbatodinium gochtii|Imbatodinium]]</I>. [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.58) retained this species in <I>Batioladinium</I>. Questionable assignment: [[Lentin and Williams, 1977b|Lentin and Williams (1977b]], p.14). Taxonomic junior synonyms: <I>[[Batioladinium pomum]]</I> and <I>[[Batioladinium varigranosum]]</I>, both according to [[Below, 1990|Below (1990]], p.53). [[Below, 1990|Below (1990]], p.53) considered <I>Batioladinium</I>? <I>gochtii</I> to be a possible taxonomic synonym of <I>[[Broomea jaegeri|Broomea]]</I> (now <I>[[Batioladinium jaegeri|Batioladinium]]</I>) <I>[[Broomea jaegeri|jaegeri]]</I>. Age: Valanginian–?Hauterivian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
| + | [[Category:HasImage]] | ||
| − | <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Batioladinium_gochtii.jpg]]</CENTER> | + | <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Batioladinium_gochtii.jpg|link=]]</CENTER> |
[[Category:Taxon]] | [[Category:Taxon]] | ||
[[Category:Species|gochtii Batioladinium]] | [[Category:Species|gochtii Batioladinium]] | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:14, 30 December 2016
?gochtii (Alberti, 1961, p.27, pl.5, figs.8–10,?16) Lentin and Williams, 1977b, p.14. Holotype: Alberti, 1961, pl.5, fig.8. Originally Broomea, subsequently (and now) Batioladinium?, thirdly Necrobroomea, fourthly Imbatodinium. Lentin and Williams (1993, p.58) retained this species in Batioladinium. Questionable assignment: Lentin and Williams (1977b, p.14). Taxonomic junior synonyms: Batioladinium pomum and Batioladinium varigranosum, both according to Below (1990, p.53). Below (1990, p.53) considered Batioladinium? gochtii to be a possible taxonomic synonym of Broomea (now Batioladinium) jaegeri. Age: Valanginian–?Hauterivian.
Infrataxon List: