Difference between revisions of "Batioladinium gochtii"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
?<I><B>gochtii</B></I> ([[Alberti, 1961]], p.27, pl.5, figs.8&ndash;10,?16) [[Lentin and Williams, 1977b]], p.14.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Alberti, 1961]], pl.5, fig.8.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Broomea gochtii|Broomea]]</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Batioladinium</I>?, thirdly <I>[[Necrobroomea gochtii|Necrobroomea]]</I>, fourthly <I>[[Imbatodinium gochtii|Imbatodinium]]</I>.&nbsp; [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.58) retained this species in <I>Batioladinium</I>.&nbsp; Questionable assignment: [[Lentin and Williams, 1977b|Lentin and Williams (1977b]], p.14).&nbsp; Taxonomic junior synonyms: <I>[[Batioladinium pomum]]</I> and <I>[[Batioladinium varigranosum]]</I>, both according to [[Below, 1990|Below (1990]], p.53).&nbsp; [[Below, 1990|Below (1990]], p.53) considered <I>Batioladinium</I>? <I>gochtii</I> to be a possible taxonomic synonym of <I>[[Broomea jaegeri|Broomea]]</I> (now <I>[[Batioladinium jaegeri|Batioladinium]]</I>) <I>[[Broomea jaegeri|jaegeri]]</I>.&nbsp; Age: Valanginian&ndash;?Hauterivian.
 
?<I><B>gochtii</B></I> ([[Alberti, 1961]], p.27, pl.5, figs.8&ndash;10,?16) [[Lentin and Williams, 1977b]], p.14.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Alberti, 1961]], pl.5, fig.8.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Broomea gochtii|Broomea]]</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Batioladinium</I>?, thirdly <I>[[Necrobroomea gochtii|Necrobroomea]]</I>, fourthly <I>[[Imbatodinium gochtii|Imbatodinium]]</I>.&nbsp; [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.58) retained this species in <I>Batioladinium</I>.&nbsp; Questionable assignment: [[Lentin and Williams, 1977b|Lentin and Williams (1977b]], p.14).&nbsp; Taxonomic junior synonyms: <I>[[Batioladinium pomum]]</I> and <I>[[Batioladinium varigranosum]]</I>, both according to [[Below, 1990|Below (1990]], p.53).&nbsp; [[Below, 1990|Below (1990]], p.53) considered <I>Batioladinium</I>? <I>gochtii</I> to be a possible taxonomic synonym of <I>[[Broomea jaegeri|Broomea]]</I> (now <I>[[Batioladinium jaegeri|Batioladinium]]</I>) <I>[[Broomea jaegeri|jaegeri]]</I>.&nbsp; Age: Valanginian&ndash;?Hauterivian.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 +
[[Category:HasImage]]
  
 
<BR><CENTER>[[Image:Batioladinium_gochtii.jpg|link=]]</CENTER>
 
<BR><CENTER>[[Image:Batioladinium_gochtii.jpg|link=]]</CENTER>

Latest revision as of 14:14, 30 December 2016

?gochtii (Alberti, 1961, p.27, pl.5, figs.8–10,?16) Lentin and Williams, 1977b, p.14.  Holotype: Alberti, 1961, pl.5, fig.8.  Originally Broomea, subsequently (and now) Batioladinium?, thirdly Necrobroomea, fourthly ImbatodiniumLentin and Williams (1993, p.58) retained this species in Batioladinium.  Questionable assignment: Lentin and Williams (1977b, p.14).  Taxonomic junior synonyms: Batioladinium pomum and Batioladinium varigranosum, both according to Below (1990, p.53).  Below (1990, p.53) considered Batioladinium? gochtii to be a possible taxonomic synonym of Broomea (now Batioladinium) jaegeri.  Age: Valanginian–?Hauterivian.


Batioladinium gochtii.jpg
Parent: Batioladinium

Infrataxon List: