Difference between revisions of "Baltisphaeridium colligerum Appendix A"
From dinoflaj3
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "<B><I>colligerum</I></B>" ([[Deflandre and Cookson, 1955]], p.278 | + | "<B><I>colligerum</I></B>" ([[Deflandre and Cookson, 1955]], p.278–279, pl.7, fig.3) [[Downie and Sarjeant, 1965]], p.88. Emendations: [[Cookson, 1965a]], p.86; [[Goodman and Witmer, 1985]], p.77–78, both as <I>[[Diphyes colligerum]]</I>. Holotype: [[Deflandre and Cookson, 1955]], pl.7, fig.3. <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Diphyes colligerum|Diphyes]]</I>. Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium colligerum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I>, subsequently <I>Baltisphaeridium</I> (Appendix A), thirdly (and now) <I>[[Diphyes colligerum|Diphyes]]</I>. Taxonomic junior synonym: <I>Diphyes pseuodoficusoides</I> according to [[Fensome et al., 2009|Fensome et al. (2009]], p.30). This combination was not validly published in [[Downie and Sarjeant, 1963|Downie and Sarjeant (1963]], p.92), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: early Eocene. |
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:59, 21 December 2016
"colligerum" (Deflandre and Cookson, 1955, p.278–279, pl.7, fig.3) Downie and Sarjeant, 1965, p.88. Emendations: Cookson, 1965a, p.86; Goodman and Witmer, 1985, p.77–78, both as Diphyes colligerum. Holotype: Deflandre and Cookson, 1955, pl.7, fig.3. NOW Diphyes. Originally Hystrichosphaeridium, subsequently Baltisphaeridium (Appendix A), thirdly (and now) Diphyes. Taxonomic junior synonym: Diphyes pseuodoficusoides according to Fensome et al. (2009, p.30). This combination was not validly published in Downie and Sarjeant (1963, p.92), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: early Eocene.
Parent: Baltisphaeridium_Appendix A