Difference between revisions of "Andriella"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"<B><I>ANDRIELLA</I></B>" [[Bolli, 1974|Bolli 1974]], p.845. Calcareous dinoflagellate genus (see [[Elbrächter et al., 2008]], p.1298). <B>Taxonomic senior synonym:</B> <I>[[Pithonella]]</I>, according to Wendler et al. (2013, p.1098). This name was casually introduced in running text and its validity might be in question under the I.C.N.; however, [[Elbrächter et al., 2008|Elbrächter et al. (2008]], p.1298) implied that it can be accepted as valid since it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N. Type: <I>[[Pithonella trejoi]]</I>. | "<B><I>ANDRIELLA</I></B>" [[Bolli, 1974|Bolli 1974]], p.845. Calcareous dinoflagellate genus (see [[Elbrächter et al., 2008]], p.1298). <B>Taxonomic senior synonym:</B> <I>[[Pithonella]]</I>, according to Wendler et al. (2013, p.1098). This name was casually introduced in running text and its validity might be in question under the I.C.N.; however, [[Elbrächter et al., 2008|Elbrächter et al. (2008]], p.1298) implied that it can be accepted as valid since it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N. Type: <I>[[Pithonella trejoi]]</I>. | ||
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Index2016new]] | ||
[[Category:Taxon]] | [[Category:Taxon]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Revision as of 16:32, 4 December 2016
"ANDRIELLA" Bolli 1974, p.845. Calcareous dinoflagellate genus (see Elbrächter et al., 2008, p.1298). Taxonomic senior synonym: Pithonella, according to Wendler et al. (2013, p.1098). This name was casually introduced in running text and its validity might be in question under the I.C.N.; however, Elbrächter et al. (2008, p.1298) implied that it can be accepted as valid since it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N. Type: Pithonella trejoi.
Species List: