Difference between revisions of "Batioladinium pelliferum"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 16:35, 4 December 2016

?pelliferum (Alberti, 1961, p.26, pl.5, figs.11-13) Brideaux, 1975, p.1240.  Holotype: Alberti, 1961, pl.5, fig.11.  Originally Broomea, subsequently (and now) Batioladinium?, thirdly Imbatodinium, fourthly NecrobroomeaLentin and Williams (1993, p.59) questionably retained this species in Batioladinium.  Questionable assignment: Brideaux (1975, p.1240).  Taxonomic senior synonym: Broomea (now Batioladinium) micropoda, according to Wiggins (1975, p.111) - however, Dörhöfer and Davies (1980, p.38) retained Broomea (as Batioladinium?) pelliferaBelow (1990, p.53) considered Broomea (as Necrobroomea, now Batioladinium) exigua to be a possible taxonomic synonym of this species.  Age: Late Barremian-Early Aptian.

Parent: Batioladinium