Difference between revisions of "Batioladinium gochtii"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
| − | <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Batioladinium_gochtii.jpg]]</CENTER> | + | <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Batioladinium_gochtii.jpg|link=]]</CENTER> |
[[Category:Taxon]] | [[Category:Taxon]] | ||
[[Category:Species|gochtii Batioladinium]] | [[Category:Species|gochtii Batioladinium]] | ||
Revision as of 17:32, 5 December 2016
?gochtii (Alberti, 1961, p.27, pl.5, figs.8-10,?16) Lentin and Williams, 1977b, p.14. Holotype: Alberti, 1961, pl.5, fig.8. Originally Broomea, subsequently (and now) Batioladinium?, thirdly Necrobroomea, fourthly Imbatodinium. Lentin and Williams (1993, p.58) retained this species in Batioladinium. Questionable assignment: Lentin and Williams (1977b, p.14). Taxonomic junior synonyms: Batioladinium pomum and Batioladinium varigranosum, both according to Below (1990, p.53). Below (1990, p.53) considered Batioladinium? gochtii to be a possible taxonomic synonym of Broomea (now Batioladinium) jaegeri. Age: Valanginian-?Hauterivian.
Infrataxon List: