Difference between revisions of "Batioladinium exiguum"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 16:35, 4 December 2016

?exiguum (Alberti, 1961, p.26-27, pl.5, fig.14) Brideaux, 1975, p.1240.  Holotype: Alberti, 1961, pl.5, fig.14.  Originally Broomea, subsequently (and now) Batioladinium?, thirdly Necrobroomea, fourthly Imbatodinium.  Questionable assignment: Brideaux (1975, p.1240).  Lentin and Williams (1993, p.58) retained this species in BatioladiniumBelow (1990, p.53) suggested that this species may be a taxonomic synonym of Batioladinium? (as Necrobroomea) pelliferum.  Age: Early Hauterivian-?Late Barremian.

Parent: Batioladinium