Difference between revisions of "Neogippslandia extensa"
From dinoflaj3
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "<nowiki>*</nowiki><B><I>extensa</I></B>" ([[Stover, 1974]], p.178 | + | "<nowiki>*</nowiki><B><I>extensa</I></B>" ([[Stover, 1974]], p.178–179, pl.5, figs.4a–c,5a–d,6) [[Özdikmen, 2009]], p.235. Holotype: [[Stover, 1974]], pl.5, figs.4a–c; [[Fensome et al., 1993a]], figs.1–3 — p.1167. Originally <I>[[Deflandrea extensa|Deflandrea]]</I>, subsequently <I>[[Vozzhennikovia extensa|Vozzhennikovia]]</I>?, thirdly <I>[[Dioxya extensa|Dioxya]]</I>?, fourthly <I>[[Lentinia extensa|Lentinia]]</I>, fifthly (and now) <I>[[Gippslandia extensa|Gippslandia]]</I>, sixthly <I>Neogippslandia</I> (generic name illegitimate). Although [[Özdikmen, 2009|Özdikmen (2009]]) did not fully reference the basionym when proposing the transfer of this species to <I>Neogippslandia</I>, he did so under the aegis of the I.C.Z.N., so the combination can be considered validly published. Age: middle-late Eocene. |
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Index2016new]] | ||
[[Category:Taxon]] | [[Category:Taxon]] | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:37, 21 December 2016
"*extensa" (Stover, 1974, p.178–179, pl.5, figs.4a–c,5a–d,6) Özdikmen, 2009, p.235. Holotype: Stover, 1974, pl.5, figs.4a–c; Fensome et al., 1993a, figs.1–3 — p.1167. Originally Deflandrea, subsequently Vozzhennikovia?, thirdly Dioxya?, fourthly Lentinia, fifthly (and now) Gippslandia, sixthly Neogippslandia (generic name illegitimate). Although Özdikmen (2009) did not fully reference the basionym when proposing the transfer of this species to Neogippslandia, he did so under the aegis of the I.C.Z.N., so the combination can be considered validly published. Age: middle-late Eocene.
Parent: Neogippslandia