Difference between revisions of "Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. callosum Appendix A"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
subsp. <I><B>callosum</B></I> ([[Sannemann, 1955]], p.325-326, pl.1, figs.1-4,7; pl.3, figs.2-5,10; pl.4, figs.3-9; pl.6, figs.11-12; text-figs.2a-d) [[Fensome et al., 1990]], p.87. Holotype: [[Sannemann, 1955]], pl.4, fig.3. Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. callosum|Hystrichosphaeridium brevispinosum]]</I> subsp. <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. callosum|callosum]]</I>, subsequently <I>[[Buedingiisphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. callosum Appendix A|Buedingiisphaeridium brevispinosum]]</I> subsp. <I>[[Buedingiisphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. callosum Appendix A|callosum]]</I> (combination not validly published, Appendix A), thirdly (and now) <I>Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum</I> subsp. <I>callosum</I>. This combination was not validly published in [[Downie and Sarjeant, 1963|Downie and Sarjeant (1963]] p.90), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym, nor was it validly published in [[Eisenack et al., 1973|Eisenack et al. (1973]], p.79-80), since these authors did not give a clear indication of taxonomic rank. Le Herissé in Ribecai and Tongiorgi (1999, p.124) considered this taxon and <I>[[Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. castaneoides Appendix A|Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum]]</I> subsp. <I>[[Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. castaneoides Appendix A|castaneoides]]</I> to be "... related to mazuelloids or muellerisphaerids (mineralized microfossils)" and not conspecific with <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium brevispinosum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I> (now <I>[[Pachysphaeridium brevispinosum Appendix A|Pachysphaeridium]]</I>) <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium brevispinosum|brevispinosum]]</I>, but no new taxonomic assignations were proposed. We feel that, although the species has been transferred to <I>[[Pachysphaeridium Appendix A|Pachysphaeridium]]</I>, since this Index does not treat acritarchs or mineralized microfossils in detail, it would be inappropriate for us to make taxonomic proposals here; hence we leave two subspecies (and the autonym) "in limbo". Age: Devonian (Late Givetian). | subsp. <I><B>callosum</B></I> ([[Sannemann, 1955]], p.325-326, pl.1, figs.1-4,7; pl.3, figs.2-5,10; pl.4, figs.3-9; pl.6, figs.11-12; text-figs.2a-d) [[Fensome et al., 1990]], p.87. Holotype: [[Sannemann, 1955]], pl.4, fig.3. Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. callosum|Hystrichosphaeridium brevispinosum]]</I> subsp. <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. callosum|callosum]]</I>, subsequently <I>[[Buedingiisphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. callosum Appendix A|Buedingiisphaeridium brevispinosum]]</I> subsp. <I>[[Buedingiisphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. callosum Appendix A|callosum]]</I> (combination not validly published, Appendix A), thirdly (and now) <I>Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum</I> subsp. <I>callosum</I>. This combination was not validly published in [[Downie and Sarjeant, 1963|Downie and Sarjeant (1963]] p.90), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym, nor was it validly published in [[Eisenack et al., 1973|Eisenack et al. (1973]], p.79-80), since these authors did not give a clear indication of taxonomic rank. Le Herissé in Ribecai and Tongiorgi (1999, p.124) considered this taxon and <I>[[Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. castaneoides Appendix A|Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum]]</I> subsp. <I>[[Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. castaneoides Appendix A|castaneoides]]</I> to be "... related to mazuelloids or muellerisphaerids (mineralized microfossils)" and not conspecific with <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium brevispinosum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I> (now <I>[[Pachysphaeridium brevispinosum Appendix A|Pachysphaeridium]]</I>) <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium brevispinosum|brevispinosum]]</I>, but no new taxonomic assignations were proposed. We feel that, although the species has been transferred to <I>[[Pachysphaeridium Appendix A|Pachysphaeridium]]</I>, since this Index does not treat acritarchs or mineralized microfossils in detail, it would be inappropriate for us to make taxonomic proposals here; hence we leave two subspecies (and the autonym) "in limbo". Age: Devonian (Late Givetian). | ||
[[Category:Taxon]] | [[Category:Taxon]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Subspecies]] | + | [[Category:Subspecies|callosum brevispinosum Baltisphaeridium]] |
| − | [[Category:Appendix A]][[Parent Species::Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum]] | + | [[Category:Appendix A]] |
| + | <B>Parent:</B> [[Parent Species::Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:20, 8 September 2015
subsp. callosum (Sannemann, 1955, p.325-326, pl.1, figs.1-4,7; pl.3, figs.2-5,10; pl.4, figs.3-9; pl.6, figs.11-12; text-figs.2a-d) Fensome et al., 1990, p.87. Holotype: Sannemann, 1955, pl.4, fig.3. Originally Hystrichosphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. callosum, subsequently Buedingiisphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. callosum (combination not validly published, Appendix A), thirdly (and now) Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. callosum. This combination was not validly published in Downie and Sarjeant (1963 p.90), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym, nor was it validly published in Eisenack et al. (1973, p.79-80), since these authors did not give a clear indication of taxonomic rank. Le Herissé in Ribecai and Tongiorgi (1999, p.124) considered this taxon and Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum subsp. castaneoides to be "... related to mazuelloids or muellerisphaerids (mineralized microfossils)" and not conspecific with Hystrichosphaeridium (now Pachysphaeridium) brevispinosum, but no new taxonomic assignations were proposed. We feel that, although the species has been transferred to Pachysphaeridium, since this Index does not treat acritarchs or mineralized microfossils in detail, it would be inappropriate for us to make taxonomic proposals here; hence we leave two subspecies (and the autonym) "in limbo". Age: Devonian (Late Givetian). Parent: Baltisphaeridium brevispinosum
