Difference between revisions of "Ceratiopsis Vozzhennikova 1963"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"<B><I>CERATIOPSIS</I></B>" [[Vozzhennikova, 1963]], p.181.&nbsp; Emendation: [[Bujak et al., 1980]], p.27.&nbsp; <B>Name illegitimate</B> - <B>senior homonym</B>: <I>Ceratiopsis</I> [[de Wildeman, 1896]].&nbsp; <B>Taxonomic senior synonym</B>: <I>[[Cerodinium]]</I>, by implication in [[Lentin and Williams, 1977b|Lentin and Williams (1977b]], p.20), who considered <I>Ceratiopsis</I> to be the senior name.&nbsp; Taxonomic senior synonym: <I>[[Deflandrea]]</I>, according to [[Lentin and Williams, 1976|Lentin and Williams (1976]], p.153) - however, [[Lentin and Williams, 1985|Lentin and Williams (1985]], p.48) retained <I>Ceratiopsis</I>.&nbsp; [[Lindgren, 1985|Lindgren (1985]], p.670) maintained that the name <I>Ceratiopsis</I> was not validly published in [[Vozzhennikova, 1963|Vozzhennikova 1963]], stating that the species <I>[[Ceratiopsis leptoderma]]</I> was described, but not the genus <I>Ceratiopsis</I> and that the latter was not monotypic, containing three species.&nbsp; However, since only one species, <I>[[Ceratiopsis leptoderma]]</I>, was assigned to <I>Ceratiopsis</I> by [[Vozzhennikova, 1963|Vozzhennikova (1963]]), the single description provided can be applied to both genus and species and the name <I>Ceratiopsis</I> can be deemed to have been validly published in [[Vozzhennikova, 1963|Vozzhennikova (1963]]) (I.C.N. Article 38.5).&nbsp; Type: [[Vozzhennikova, 1963]], text-fig.8, as <I>[[Ceratiopsis leptoderma]]</I>.
+
"<B><I>CERATIOPSIS</I></B>" [[Vozzhennikova, 1963]], p.181.&nbsp; Emendation: [[Bujak et al., 1980]], p.27.&nbsp; <B>Name illegitimate</B> &mdash; <B>senior homonym</B>: <I>Ceratiopsis</I> [[de Wildeman, 1896]].&nbsp; <B>Taxonomic senior synonym</B>: <I>[[Cerodinium]]</I>, by implication in [[Lentin and Williams, 1977b|Lentin and Williams (1977b]], p.20), who considered <I>Ceratiopsis</I> to be the senior name.&nbsp; Taxonomic senior synonym: <I>[[Deflandrea]]</I>, according to [[Lentin and Williams, 1976|Lentin and Williams (1976]], p.153) &mdash; however, [[Lentin and Williams, 1985|Lentin and Williams (1985]], p.48) retained <I>Ceratiopsis</I>.&nbsp; [[Lindgren, 1985|Lindgren (1985]], p.670) maintained that the name <I>Ceratiopsis</I> was not validly published in [[Vozzhennikova, 1963|Vozzhennikova 1963]], stating that the species <I>[[Ceratiopsis leptoderma]]</I> was described, but not the genus <I>Ceratiopsis</I> and that the latter was not monotypic, containing three species.&nbsp; However, since only one species, <I>[[Ceratiopsis leptoderma]]</I>, was assigned to <I>Ceratiopsis</I> by [[Vozzhennikova, 1963|Vozzhennikova (1963]]), the single description provided can be applied to both genus and species and the name <I>Ceratiopsis</I> can be deemed to have been validly published in [[Vozzhennikova, 1963|Vozzhennikova (1963]]) (I.C.N. Article 38.5).&nbsp; Type: [[Vozzhennikova, 1963]], text-fig.8, as <I>[[Ceratiopsis leptoderma]]</I>.
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
  
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Latest revision as of 19:08, 21 December 2016

"CERATIOPSIS" Vozzhennikova, 1963, p.181.  Emendation: Bujak et al., 1980, p.27.  Name illegitimatesenior homonym: Ceratiopsis de Wildeman, 1896Taxonomic senior synonym: Cerodinium, by implication in Lentin and Williams (1977b, p.20), who considered Ceratiopsis to be the senior name.  Taxonomic senior synonym: Deflandrea, according to Lentin and Williams (1976, p.153) — however, Lentin and Williams (1985, p.48) retained CeratiopsisLindgren (1985, p.670) maintained that the name Ceratiopsis was not validly published in Vozzhennikova 1963, stating that the species Ceratiopsis leptoderma was described, but not the genus Ceratiopsis and that the latter was not monotypic, containing three species.  However, since only one species, Ceratiopsis leptoderma, was assigned to Ceratiopsis by Vozzhennikova (1963), the single description provided can be applied to both genus and species and the name Ceratiopsis can be deemed to have been validly published in Vozzhennikova (1963) (I.C.N. Article 38.5).  Type: Vozzhennikova, 1963, text-fig.8, as Ceratiopsis leptoderma.

Parent: Subfamily Deflandreoideae

Species List: