Difference between revisions of "Rhombodinium vozzhennikovae"

?<B><I>vozzhennikovae</I></B> Williams et al., 2015, p.311.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Vozzhennikova, 1960]], pl.3, fig.1, lost according to [[Lentin and Vozzhennikova, 1989|Lentin and Vozzhennikova (1989]], p.215-216).&nbsp; Substitute name for <I>[[Kisselevia major]]</I> [[Vozzhennikova, 1967]], p.104-105.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Kisselevia major]]</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Rhombodinium</I>? <I>vozzhennikovae</I>.&nbsp; Questionable assignment: Williams et al. (2015, p.311).&nbsp; Williams et al. (2015) proposed <I>Rhombodinium</I>? <I>vozzhennovae</I> as a substitute name for <I>[[Kisselevia major]]</I> [[Vozzhennikova, 1967]], p.104-105 as the epithet <I>majus</I> (al. <I>major</I>) is already occupied by <I>[[Rhombodinium majus|Rhombodinium]]</I>? <I>[[Rhombodinium majus|majus]]</I> Yu Jingxian.&nbsp; [[Fensome and Williams, 2004|Fensome and Williams (2004]], p.382) did not follow [[Lentin and Vozzhennikova, 1989|Lentin and Vozzhennikova (1989]]) in considering the name <I>[[Kisselevia major]]</I> to be not validly published; [[Vozzhennikova, 1967|Vozzhennikova (1967]]) provided a description and designated a holotype from [[Vozzhennikova, 1960|Vozzhennikova (1960]]).&nbsp; That the holotype is lost has no bearing on the validity of the name.&nbsp; [[Lentin and Vozzhennikova, 1989|Lentin and Vozzhennikova (1989]]) noted that no potential lectotype is available.&nbsp; The name <I>[[Kisselevia major]]</I> was not valdily published in [[Vozzhennikova, 1963|Vozzhennikova (1963]], fig.15) since that author did not provide a description.&nbsp; Age: Eocene.